Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:26:16
Country: (1345 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emily: +5.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
5.2%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emily: +2.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
2.7%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emily: +0.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
0.9%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emily (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:52 (+21.6%) | 4:06 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+21.6% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:03 (-2.7%) | 5:09 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+2.7% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:35 (-3.3%) | 4:45 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+3.3% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 43:52 (+0.9%) | 42:41 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.9% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:23 (+20.4%) | 1:52 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+20.4% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:10 (+8.9%) | 3:34 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+8.9% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:06 (-8.0%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+8.0% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:52 (-6.4%) | 1:48 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+6.4% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:28 (-1.2%) | 4:25 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+1.2% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emily, Orange = 16-29 Age Group