Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Men
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:14:00
Country: (62 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Tin: -13.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Tin
13.0%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Tin: -5.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Tin
5.5%
16-29 Age Group
running
Tin: +2.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Tin
2.4%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Tin (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:30 (-28.0%) | 2:41 (+0.0%) |
Tin
+28.0% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:20 (-8.5%) | 4:17 (+0.0%) |
Tin
+8.5% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:01 (-2.6%) | 3:49 (+0.0%) |
Tin
+2.6% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 41:12 (+2.4%) | 35:57 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.4% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:00 (-5.0%) | 1:48 (+0.0%) |
Tin
+5.0% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:04 (-33.2%) | 3:27 (+0.0%) |
Tin
+33.2% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:35 (-10.9%) | 3:11 (+0.0%) |
Tin
+10.9% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 3:15 (+5.9%) | 2:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+5.9% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 6:27 (+15.6%) | 4:38 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+15.6% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Tin, Orange = 16-29 Age Group