Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:24:26
Country: (52 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Sara: +6.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Sara
6.2%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Sara: +7.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Sara
7.5%
16-29 Age Group
running
Sara: -35.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Sara
35.0%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Sara (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:30 (+12.5%) | 3:40 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+12.5% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:24 (+4.5%) | 4:57 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.5% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:48 (+1.8%) | 4:32 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.8% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 22:44 (-35.0%) | 28:43 (+0.0%) |
Sara
+35.0% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:02 (-5.5%) | 2:01 (+0.0%) |
Sara
+5.5% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:15 (-8.6%) | 4:14 (+0.0%) |
Sara
+8.6% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:20 (+9.3%) | 3:37 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+9.3% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 3:03 (+15.4%) | 2:20 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+15.4% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 6:55 (+27.0%) | 5:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+27.0% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Sara, Orange = 16-29 Age Group