Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:24:26
Country: (52 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emma: -5.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
5.1%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emma: -5.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
5.3%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emma: -47.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
47.5%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emma (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:33 (-18.2%) | 3:40 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+18.2% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:15 (-1.5%) | 4:57 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+1.5% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 5:03 (+4.2%) | 4:32 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.2% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 20:26 (-47.5%) | 28:43 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+47.5% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:33 (+12.8%) | 2:01 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+12.8% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 5:08 (+2.8%) | 4:14 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.8% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:49 (-9.5%) | 3:37 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+9.5% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:15 (-21.5%) | 2:20 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+21.5% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 5:15 (-10.8%) | 5:09 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+10.8% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emma, Orange = 16-29 Age Group