Age Group Comparison

New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Women

Comparison Scope:

Chelsea Harms

Place: 358

Time: 1:26:28

Country: United States

Percentile: 29.9th

Place: N/A

Time: 1:39:31

Country: (3085 athletes)

Percentile: 50.0th

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Chelsea: +3.5% | 30-34 Age Group: +0.0%

Chelsea

3.5%

30-34 Age Group

strength Chelsea: +19.9% | 30-34 Age Group: +0.0%

Chelsea

19.9%

30-34 Age Group

running Chelsea: +1.5% | 30-34 Age Group: +0.0%

Chelsea

1.5%

30-34 Age Group

Exercise	Category	Chelsea (vs Expected)	30-34 Age Group (vs Expected)	Better Performance
Burpee Broad Jump	aerobic	5:39 (+5.1%)	7:07 (+0.0%)	30-34 Age Group +5.1% better
Row	aerobic	5:20 (+1.8%)	5:36 (+0.0%)	30-34 Age Group +1.8% better
SkiErg	aerobic	5:07 (+3.4%)	5:17 (+0.0%)	30-34 Age Group +3.4% better
Total Running	running	37:31 (+1.5%)	41:43 (+0.0%)	30-34 Age Group +1.5% better
Farmers Carry	strength	3:45 (+64.2%)	2:26 (+0.0%)	30-34 Age Group +64.2% better
Sandbag Lunges	strength	4:54 (+7.0%)	5:32 (+0.0%)	30-34 Age Group +7.0% better
Sled Pull	strength	4:52 (+21.2%)	6:20 (+0.0%)	30-34 Age Group +21.2% better
Sled Push	strength	2:00 (-12.8%)	2:54 (+0.0%)	Chelsea +12.8% better

• Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
• Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
• Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
• Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
• Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
• Colors: Blue = Chelsea, Orange = 30-34 Age Group