Age Group Comparison
Rimini 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:24:55
Country: (305 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Nina: -18.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nina
18.7%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Nina: -11.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nina
11.8%
16-29 Age Group
running
Nina: +4.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nina
4.9%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Nina (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:25 (-20.7%) | 4:04 (+0.0%) |
Nina
+20.7% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:23 (-16.7%) | 5:09 (+0.0%) |
Nina
+16.7% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 44:51 (+4.9%) | 42:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.9% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:12 (+15.1%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+15.1% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:40 (-30.3%) | 3:36 (+0.0%) |
Nina
+30.3% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:59 (-12.1%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
Nina
+12.1% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:32 (-14.6%) | 1:44 (+0.0%) |
Nina
+14.6% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:31 (-17.2%) | 4:17 (+0.0%) |
Nina
+17.2% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Nina, Orange = 16-29 Age Group