Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Nathan: -1.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nathan
1.2%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Nathan: +0.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nathan
0.1%
16-29 Age Group
running
Nathan: -7.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nathan
7.4%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Nathan (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:59 (-0.0%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
Nathan
+0.0% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:11 (-4.0%) | 4:46 (+0.0%) |
Nathan
+4.0% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:04 (+0.4%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.4% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 29:37 (-7.4%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
Nathan
+7.4% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:21 (-10.4%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
Nathan
+10.4% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:51 (-9.4%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Nathan
+9.4% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:45 (+7.3%) | 2:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:06 (+13.0%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+13.0% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Nathan, Orange = 16-29 Age Group