Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Lewis: -0.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lewis
0.4%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Lewis: -3.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lewis
3.1%
16-29 Age Group
running
Lewis: +10.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lewis
10.1%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Lewis (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:05 (-5.3%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
Lewis
+5.3% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:37 (+3.2%) | 4:46 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.2% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:10 (+0.9%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.9% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 37:06 (+10.1%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+10.1% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:35 (+0.1%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.1% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:52 (-9.2%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
Lewis
+9.2% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:17 (-2.0%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Lewis
+2.0% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:49 (-1.4%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Lewis
+1.4% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Lewis, Orange = 16-29 Age Group