Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:19:01
Country: (264 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Alice: -1.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Alice
1.1%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Alice: -2.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Alice
2.4%
16-29 Age Group
running
Alice: +9.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Alice
9.9%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Alice (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:20 (-3.5%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Alice
+3.5% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:41 (+2.8%) | 4:44 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.8% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:05 (-2.5%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
Alice
+2.5% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 38:25 (+9.9%) | 39:21 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+9.9% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:29 (-9.4%) | 1:46 (+0.0%) |
Alice
+9.4% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:03 (-8.4%) | 3:38 (+0.0%) |
Alice
+8.4% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:44 (+6.7%) | 3:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+6.7% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:07 (+1.7%) | 4:39 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.7% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Alice, Orange = 16-29 Age Group