Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Charlotte: +7.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Charlotte
7.0%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Charlotte: +5.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Charlotte
5.4%
16-29 Age Group
running
Charlotte: -28.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Charlotte
28.7%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Charlotte (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:13 (+14.3%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+14.3% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:15 (-0.2%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
Charlotte
+0.2% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 26:00 (-28.7%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
Charlotte
+28.7% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:45 (+34.2%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+34.2% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:32 (-3.9%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Charlotte
+3.9% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:51 (-2.2%) | 2:09 (+0.0%) |
Charlotte
+2.2% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:59 (-6.5%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Charlotte
+6.5% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Charlotte, Orange = 16-29 Age Group