Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Alex: +14.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Alex
14.2%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Alex: +13.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Alex
13.5%
16-29 Age Group
running
Alex: -31.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Alex
31.8%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Alex (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:43 (+26.8%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+26.8% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:20 (+1.5%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.5% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 24:59 (-31.8%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
Alex
+31.8% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:09 (+25.5%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+25.5% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:54 (+9.3%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+9.3% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:27 (+20.3%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+20.3% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:07 (+11.2%) | 2:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+11.2% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:20 (+1.0%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.0% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Alex, Orange = 16-29 Age Group