Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Thomas: -12.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Thomas
12.3%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Thomas: -12.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Thomas
12.5%
16-29 Age Group
running
Thomas: +0.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Thomas
0.2%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Thomas (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:41 (-29.6%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
Thomas
+29.6% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:24 (-6.6%) | 4:46 (+0.0%) |
Thomas
+6.6% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:16 (-0.7%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
Thomas
+0.7% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 37:19 (+0.2%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.2% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:36 (-8.0%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
Thomas
+8.0% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:48 (-23.3%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
Thomas
+23.3% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:16 (-13.4%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Thomas
+13.4% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:09 (-5.1%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Thomas
+5.1% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Thomas, Orange = 16-29 Age Group