Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:19:01
Country: (264 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Lucy: -2.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lucy
2.2%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Lucy: +5.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lucy
5.5%
16-29 Age Group
running
Lucy: -16.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lucy
16.1%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Lucy (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:36 (-8.3%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Lucy
+8.3% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:53 (+2.6%) | 4:44 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.6% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:18 (-0.7%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
Lucy
+0.7% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 31:50 (-16.1%) | 39:21 (+0.0%) |
Lucy
+16.1% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:55 (+8.2%) | 1:46 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+8.2% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:36 (-4.0%) | 3:38 (+0.0%) |
Lucy
+4.0% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:55 (-3.2%) | 1:58 (+0.0%) |
Lucy
+3.2% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 5:25 (+21.0%) | 4:39 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+21.0% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Lucy, Orange = 16-29 Age Group