Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:19:01
Country: (264 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Philip: -0.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Philip
0.0%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Philip: -9.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Philip
9.0%
16-29 Age Group
running
Philip: +13.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Philip
13.4%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Philip (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:16 (+7.6%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.6% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:35 (-4.0%) | 4:44 (+0.0%) |
Philip
+4.0% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:11 (-3.7%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
Philip
+3.7% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 43:19 (+13.4%) | 39:21 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+13.4% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:44 (-2.7%) | 1:46 (+0.0%) |
Philip
+2.7% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:15 (-14.1%) | 3:38 (+0.0%) |
Philip
+14.1% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:24 (-12.5%) | 3:55 (+0.0%) |
Philip
+12.5% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:13 (-6.5%) | 4:39 (+0.0%) |
Philip
+6.5% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Philip, Orange = 16-29 Age Group