Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Kate: -6.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Kate
6.9%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Kate: -4.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Kate
4.3%
16-29 Age Group
running
Kate: +18.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Kate
18.1%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Kate (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:39 (-11.0%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
Kate
+11.0% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:42 (-2.8%) | 4:46 (+0.0%) |
Kate
+2.8% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 46:09 (+18.1%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+18.1% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:31 (-16.7%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
Kate
+16.7% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:00 (+2.4%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.4% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:10 (+4.5%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.5% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:54 (-7.1%) | 2:09 (+0.0%) |
Kate
+7.1% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:25 (-4.7%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Kate
+4.7% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Kate, Orange = 16-29 Age Group