Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:19:01
Country: (264 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Jack: +2.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Jack
2.6%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Jack: -2.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Jack
2.6%
16-29 Age Group
running
Jack: -17.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Jack
17.3%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Jack (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 5:00 (+13.6%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+13.6% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:38 (-6.6%) | 4:44 (+0.0%) |
Jack
+6.6% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:31 (+1.0%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.0% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 33:53 (-17.3%) | 39:21 (+0.0%) |
Jack
+17.3% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:39 (-13.4%) | 1:46 (+0.0%) |
Jack
+13.4% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:34 (+8.3%) | 3:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+8.3% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:00 (-7.3%) | 1:58 (+0.0%) |
Jack
+7.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 5:00 (+1.9%) | 4:39 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.9% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Jack, Orange = 16-29 Age Group