Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Dan: -4.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Dan
4.6%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Dan: +1.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Dan
1.8%
16-29 Age Group
running
Dan: -12.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Dan
12.7%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Dan (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:37 (-20.9%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
Dan
+20.9% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:09 (+2.3%) | 4:46 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.3% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:44 (+4.6%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.6% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 36:41 (-12.7%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
Dan
+12.7% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:57 (-9.0%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Dan
+9.0% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:35 (+16.4%) | 2:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+16.4% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:57 (-2.1%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Dan
+2.1% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Dan, Orange = 16-29 Age Group