Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:19:01
Country: (264 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Olivia: -8.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Olivia
8.3%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Olivia: -9.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Olivia
9.7%
16-29 Age Group
running
Olivia: -26.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Olivia
26.0%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Olivia (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:01 (-13.9%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Olivia
+13.9% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:26 (-2.6%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
Olivia
+2.6% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 31:32 (-26.0%) | 39:21 (+0.0%) |
Olivia
+26.0% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:41 (-14.9%) | 1:46 (+0.0%) |
Olivia
+14.9% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:49 (-13.3%) | 3:38 (+0.0%) |
Olivia
+13.3% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:43 (-15.8%) | 3:55 (+0.0%) |
Olivia
+15.8% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:36 (-29.0%) | 1:58 (+0.0%) |
Olivia
+29.0% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 6:24 (+24.5%) | 4:39 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+24.5% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Olivia, Orange = 16-29 Age Group