Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:19:01
Country: (264 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Jay: +2.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Jay
2.7%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Jay: -0.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Jay
0.2%
16-29 Age Group
running
Jay: +103.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Jay
103.7%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Jay (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:02 (+7.2%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.2% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:10 (-2.9%) | 4:44 (+0.0%) |
Jay
+2.9% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:09 (+3.7%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.7% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 63:11 (+103.7%) | 39:21 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+103.7% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:24 (-4.3%) | 1:46 (+0.0%) |
Jay
+4.3% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:46 (-0.5%) | 3:38 (+0.0%) |
Jay
+0.5% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:38 (+4.2%) | 4:39 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.2% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Jay, Orange = 16-29 Age Group