Age Group Comparison

Riga/Rīga 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men

Cam Fraser

Place: 130
Time: 1:15:29
Country:
Percentile: 52.6th
View detailed analysis →

16-29 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:17:14
Country: (105 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Cam: +10.9% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Cam
10.9%
16-29 Age Group
strength Cam: -1.6% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Cam
1.6%
16-29 Age Group
running Cam: -0.4% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Cam
0.4%
16-29 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category Cam (vs Expected) 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 4:04 (+23.9%) 3:28 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +23.9% better
Row aerobic 4:42 (+5.9%) 4:31 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +5.9% better
SkiErg aerobic 4:05 (+2.8%) 4:03 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +2.8% better
Total Running running 38:31 (-0.4%) 39:05 (+0.0%)
Cam +0.4% better
Farmers Carry strength 2:02 (+27.3%) 1:39 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +27.3% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 3:08 (-8.2%) 3:30 (+0.0%)
Cam +8.2% better
Sled Pull strength 2:45 (-9.2%) 3:21 (+0.0%)
Cam +9.2% better
Sled Push strength 1:12 (-19.6%) 1:37 (+0.0%)
Cam +19.6% better
Wall Balls strength 4:13 (+1.7%) 4:32 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +1.7% better

How to Read This Comparison