Age Group Comparison

Riga/Rīga 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed

Kalvis Trenmora

Place: 91
Time: 1:15:27
Country:
Percentile: 35.1th
View detailed analysis →

16-29 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:21:36
Country: (91 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Kalvis: +8.1% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Kalvis
8.1%
16-29 Age Group
strength Kalvis: -1.0% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Kalvis
1.0%
16-29 Age Group
running Kalvis: +0.5% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Kalvis
0.5%
16-29 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category Kalvis (vs Expected) 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 3:48 (+17.4%) 3:41 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +17.4% better
Row aerobic 4:40 (+3.8%) 4:40 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +3.8% better
SkiErg aerobic 4:14 (+3.2%) 4:12 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +3.2% better
Total Running running 38:14 (+0.5%) 41:19 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +0.5% better
Farmers Carry strength 1:51 (+14.4%) 1:45 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +14.4% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 3:49 (+11.1%) 3:45 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +11.1% better
Sled Pull strength 2:50 (-13.8%) 3:41 (+0.0%)
Kalvis +13.8% better
Sled Push strength 1:28 (-8.5%) 1:44 (+0.0%)
Kalvis +8.5% better
Wall Balls strength 3:42 (-8.0%) 4:28 (+0.0%)
Kalvis +8.0% better

How to Read This Comparison