Age Group Comparison
Bangkok 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:26:16
Country: (1345 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
R: -0.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
R
0.6%
16-29 Age Group
strength
R: +11.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
R
11.1%
16-29 Age Group
running
R: -1.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
R
1.9%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | R (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:02 (-4.7%) | 4:06 (+0.0%) |
R
+4.7% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:15 (-2.8%) | 5:09 (+0.0%) |
R
+2.8% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 5:21 (+5.7%) | 4:45 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+5.7% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 46:27 (-1.9%) | 42:41 (+0.0%) |
R
+1.9% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:51 (-3.2%) | 1:52 (+0.0%) |
R
+3.2% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:43 (+16.0%) | 3:34 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+16.0% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 5:31 (+12.1%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+12.1% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:21 (+19.6%) | 1:48 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+19.6% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = R, Orange = 16-29 Age Group