Age Group Comparison
Rome 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
30-34 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:24
Country: (279 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Charlotte: -2.3% |
30-34 Age Group: +0.0%
Charlotte
2.3%
30-34 Age Group
strength
Charlotte: -10.0% |
30-34 Age Group: +0.0%
Charlotte
10.0%
30-34 Age Group
running
Charlotte: +5.8% |
30-34 Age Group: +0.0%
Charlotte
5.8%
30-34 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Charlotte (vs Expected) | 30-34 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:18 (-7.7%) | 3:41 (+0.0%) |
Charlotte
+7.7% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:08 (+0.7%) | 4:54 (+0.0%) |
30-34 Age Group
+0.7% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:36 (-0.1%) | 4:26 (+0.0%) |
Charlotte
+0.1% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 40:00 (+5.8%) | 38:40 (+0.0%) |
30-34 Age Group
+5.8% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:43 (-15.4%) | 4:17 (+0.0%) |
Charlotte
+15.4% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:31 (-9.6%) | 4:48 (+0.0%) |
Charlotte
+9.6% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:27 (-1.3%) | 2:21 (+0.0%) |
Charlotte
+1.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:47 (-13.6%) | 4:40 (+0.0%) |
Charlotte
+13.6% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Charlotte, Orange = 30-34 Age Group