Age Group Comparison

Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men

Pim Gossens

Place: 132
Time: 1:04:12
Country:
Percentile: 11.5th
View detailed analysis →

35-39 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:11
Country: (2027 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Pim: +8.3% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Pim
8.3%
35-39 Age Group
strength Pim: +7.8% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Pim
7.8%
35-39 Age Group
running Pim: +1.0% | 35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Pim
1.0%
35-39 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category Pim (vs Expected) 35-39 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 2:55 (+17.4%) 3:30 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +17.4% better
Row aerobic 4:24 (+7.0%) 4:42 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +7.0% better
SkiErg aerobic 3:45 (+0.5%) 4:08 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +0.5% better
Total Running running 30:22 (+1.0%) 39:39 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +1.0% better
Farmers Carry strength 1:33 (+13.3%) 1:46 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +13.3% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 2:50 (+0.5%) 4:00 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +0.5% better
Sled Pull strength 3:08 (+17.4%) 3:48 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +17.4% better
Sled Push strength 1:31 (+11.4%) 1:56 (+0.0%)
35-39 Age Group +11.4% better
Wall Balls strength 3:44 (-3.4%) 4:52 (+0.0%)
Pim +3.4% better

How to Read This Comparison