Age Group Comparison
Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
25-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:25:36
Country: (2470 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show absolute time advantage - who was faster in raw time (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Tamar: 4:32 |
25-29 Age Group: 4:16
Tamar
5.9%
25-29 Age Group
strength
Tamar: 3:19 |
25-29 Age Group: 3:30
Tamar
5.7%
25-29 Age Group
running
Tamar: 35:13 |
25-29 Age Group: 40:25
Tamar
14.8%
25-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Absolute Times
| Exercise | Category | Tamar (Time) | 25-29 Age Group (Time) | Faster Time | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:43 | 3:38 |
25-29 Age Group
2.2% faster
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:58 | 4:51 |
25-29 Age Group
2.3% faster
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:55 | 4:19 |
25-29 Age Group
12.2% faster
|
|
| Total Running | running | 35:13 | 40:25 |
Tamar
14.8% faster
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:39 | 1:51 |
Tamar
12.1% faster
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:38 | 4:08 |
Tamar
13.8% faster
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:41 | 4:20 |
25-29 Age Group
7.5% faster
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:11 | 2:08 |
25-29 Age Group
2.3% faster
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:26 | 5:05 |
Tamar
14.7% faster
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Absolute Time Mode: Direct comparison of raw times between athletes
- • Advantage: Percentage time difference (who was faster in absolute terms)
- • Use Case: See who actually completed each segment faster, regardless of expected performance
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Tamar, Orange = 25-29 Age Group