Age Group Comparison

Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Men

Comparison Scope:

Sil Douven

Place: 1767

Time: 1:54:32

Country: Netherlands

Percentile: 93.9th

Place: N/A

Time: 1:38:00

Country: (1911 athletes)

Percentile: 50.0th

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Sil: -4.1% | 45-49 Age Group: +0.0%

Sil

4.1%

45-49 Age Group

strength Sil: +0.5% | 45-49 Age Group: +0.0%

Sil

0.5%

45-49 Age Group

running Sil: -7.6% | 45-49 Age Group: +0.0%

Sil

7.6%

45-49 Age Group

Exercise	Category	Sil (vs Expected)	45-49 Age Group (vs Expected)	Better Performance
Burpee Broad Jump	aerobic	8:40 (-1.6%)	6:40 (+0.0%)	Sil +1.6% better
Row	aerobic	5:09 (-4.6%)	5:07 (+0.0%)	Sil +4.6% better
SkiErg	aerobic	4:39 (-6.3%)	4:40 (+0.0%)	Sil +6.3% better
Total Running	running	41:40 (-7.6%)	37:27 (+0.0%)	Sil +7.6% better
Farmers Carry	strength	2:05 (-27.0%)	2:27 (+0.0%)	Sil +27.0% better
Sandbag Lunges	strength	8:35 (+15.5%)	6:19 (+0.0%)	45-49 Age Group +15.5% better
Sled Pull	strength	7:13 (+0.1%)	5:42 (+0.0%)	45-49 Age Group +0.1% better
Sled Push	strength	2:47 (-21.8%)	3:13 (+0.0%)	Sil +21.8% better
Wall Balls	strength	17:45 (+35.7%)	8:40 (+0.0%)	45-49 Age Group +35.7% better

• Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
• Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
• Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
• Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
• Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
• Colors: Blue = Sil, Orange = 45-49 Age Group