Age Group Comparison

Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Men

Comparison Scope:

Jan Overdam

Place: 288

Time: 1:48:15

Country: Netherlands

Percentile: 95.0th

Place: N/A

Time: 1:24:53

Country: (990 athletes)

Percentile: 50.0th

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Jan: -4.9% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%

Jan

4.9%

25-29 Age Group

strength Jan: -12.0% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%

Jan

12.0%

25-29 Age Group

running Jan: +3.3% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%

Jan

3.3%

25-29 Age Group

Exercise	Category	Jan (vs Expected)	25-29 Age Group (vs Expected)	Better Performance
Burpee Broad Jump	aerobic	7:45 (+7.1%)	4:36 (+0.0%)	25-29 Age Group +7.1% better
Row	aerobic	4:37 (-10.3%)	4:38 (+0.0%)	Jan +10.3% better
SkiErg	aerobic	4:06 (-11.4%)	4:16 (+0.0%)	Jan +11.4% better
Total Running	running	41:56 (+3.3%)	33:09 (+0.0%)	25-29 Age Group +3.3% better
Farmers Carry	strength	2:57 (-7.6%)	2:22 (+0.0%)	Jan +7.6% better
Sandbag Lunges	strength	7:04 (-1.4%)	5:22 (+0.0%)	Jan +1.4% better
Sled Pull	strength	9:19 (-7.0%)	6:38 (+0.0%)	Jan +7.0% better
Sled Push	strength	2:15 (-49.6%)	3:50 (+0.0%)	Jan +49.6% better
Wall Balls	strength	12:03 (+5.5%)	7:33 (+0.0%)	25-29 Age Group +5.5% better

• Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
• Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
• Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
• Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
• Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
• Colors: Blue = Jan, Orange = 25-29 Age Group