Age Group Comparison

Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Women

Comparison Scope:

Lis Hoeijmakers

Place: 272

Time: 1:28:09

Country: Netherlands

Percentile: 29.9th

Place: N/A

Time: 1:38:19

Country: (2969 athletes)

Percentile: 50.0th

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Lis: -1.0% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%

Lis

1.0%

25-29 Age Group

strength Lis: -3.7% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%

Lis

3.7%

25-29 Age Group

running Lis: +5.3% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%

Lis

5.3%

25-29 Age Group

Exercise	Category	Lis (vs Expected)	25-29 Age Group (vs Expected)	Better Performance
Burpee Broad Jump	aerobic	5:35 (-6.5%)	6:59 (+0.0%)	Lis +6.5% better
Row	aerobic	5:08 (-0.2%)	5:32 (+0.0%)	Lis +0.2% better
SkiErg	aerobic	5:07 (+3.8%)	5:14 (+0.0%)	25-29 Age Group +3.8% better
Total Running	running	39:18 (+5.3%)	41:37 (+0.0%)	25-29 Age Group +5.3% better
Farmers Carry	strength	2:00 (-0.1%)	2:26 (+0.0%)	Lis +0.1% better
Sandbag Lunges	strength	4:17 (-5.0%)	5:22 (+0.0%)	Lis +5.0% better
Sled Pull	strength	6:00 (+17.1%)	6:10 (+0.0%)	25-29 Age Group +17.1% better
Sled Push	strength	2:07 (-6.5%)	2:52 (+0.0%)	Lis +6.5% better
Wall Balls	strength	4:38 (-23.9%)	7:20 (+0.0%)	Lis +23.9% better

• Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
• Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
• Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
• Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
• Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
• Colors: Blue = Lis, Orange = 25-29 Age Group