Age Group Comparison

Maastricht 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Women

Comparison Scope:

Lisa Lamber

Place: 771

Time: 1:52:30

Country: Netherlands

Percentile: 84.7th

Place: N/A

Time: 1:38:19

Country: (2969 athletes)

Percentile: 50.0th

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Lisa: -6.3% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%

Lisa

6.3%

25-29 Age Group

strength Lisa: -1.7% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%

Lisa

1.7%

25-29 Age Group

running Lisa: -6.7% | 25-29 Age Group: +0.0%

Lisa

6.7%

25-29 Age Group

Exercise	Category	Lisa (vs Expected)	25-29 Age Group (vs Expected)	Better Performance
Burpee Broad Jump	aerobic	8:19 (-8.1%)	6:59 (+0.0%)	Lisa +8.1% better
Row	aerobic	5:29 (-5.8%)	5:32 (+0.0%)	Lisa +5.8% better
SkiErg	aerobic	5:14 (-5.0%)	5:14 (+0.0%)	Lisa +5.0% better
Total Running	running	43:40 (-6.7%)	41:37 (+0.0%)	Lisa +6.7% better
Farmers Carry	strength	2:02 (-21.8%)	2:26 (+0.0%)	Lisa +21.8% better
Sandbag Lunges	strength	5:11 (-20.0%)	5:22 (+0.0%)	Lisa +20.0% better
Sled Pull	strength	6:44 (-4.3%)	6:10 (+0.0%)	Lisa +4.3% better
Sled Push	strength	2:07 (-30.0%)	2:52 (+0.0%)	Lisa +30.0% better
Wall Balls	strength	15:52 (+67.6%)	7:20 (+0.0%)	25-29 Age Group +67.6% better

• Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
• Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
• Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
• Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
• Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
• Colors: Blue = Lisa, Orange = 25-29 Age Group