Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed Sa
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:01:15
Country: (90 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emily: +6.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
6.9%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emily: +1.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
1.9%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emily: -1.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
1.8%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emily (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:06 (+13.6%) | 2:36 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+13.6% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:30 (+6.9%) | 4:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+6.9% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:56 (+0.1%) | 3:52 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.1% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 28:10 (-1.8%) | 28:45 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+1.8% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:30 (-3.0%) | 1:32 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+3.0% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:42 (-5.9%) | 2:44 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+5.9% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:21 (+1.2%) | 3:15 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.2% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:10 (+10.1%) | 1:58 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+10.1% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:52 (+7.1%) | 3:32 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.1% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emily, Orange = 16-29 Age Group