Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed Sa
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:01:15
Country: (90 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show absolute time advantage - who was faster in raw time (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Kimberly: 3:35 |
16-29 Age Group: 3:32
Kimberly
1.4%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Kimberly: 2:52 |
16-29 Age Group: 2:36
Kimberly
9.2%
16-29 Age Group
running
Kimberly: 28:20 |
16-29 Age Group: 28:45
Kimberly
1.5%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Absolute Times
| Exercise | Category | Kimberly (Time) | 16-29 Age Group (Time) | Faster Time | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:35 | 2:36 |
Kimberly
0.6% faster
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:15 | 4:09 |
16-29 Age Group
2.4% faster
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:56 | 3:52 |
16-29 Age Group
1.7% faster
|
|
| Total Running | running | 28:20 | 28:45 |
Kimberly
1.5% faster
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:47 | 1:32 |
16-29 Age Group
14.0% faster
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:54 | 2:44 |
16-29 Age Group
5.7% faster
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:18 | 3:15 |
16-29 Age Group
1.5% faster
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:43 | 1:58 |
16-29 Age Group
27.6% faster
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:38 | 3:32 |
16-29 Age Group
2.8% faster
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Absolute Time Mode: Direct comparison of raw times between athletes
- • Advantage: Percentage time difference (who was faster in absolute terms)
- • Use Case: See who actually completed each segment faster, regardless of expected performance
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Kimberly, Orange = 16-29 Age Group