Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed Sa
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:01:15
Country: (90 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emma: -3.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
3.0%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emma: -3.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
3.3%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emma: +5.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
5.1%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emma (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:32 (+2.3%) | 2:36 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.3% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 3:50 (-6.1%) | 4:09 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+6.1% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:38 (-5.1%) | 3:52 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+5.1% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 28:44 (+5.1%) | 28:45 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+5.1% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:33 (+6.4%) | 1:32 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+6.4% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:30 (-5.0%) | 2:44 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+5.0% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:41 (-11.8%) | 3:15 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+11.8% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:47 (+1.2%) | 1:58 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.2% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:12 (-7.2%) | 3:32 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+7.2% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emma, Orange = 16-29 Age Group