Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women Su
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:06:16
Country: (91 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show absolute time advantage - who was faster in raw time (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Mackenzie: 4:10 |
16-29 Age Group: 3:55
Mackenzie
6.0%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Mackenzie: 3:07 |
16-29 Age Group: 2:56
Mackenzie
5.9%
16-29 Age Group
running
Mackenzie: 29:09 |
16-29 Age Group: 30:21
Mackenzie
4.1%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Absolute Times
| Exercise | Category | Mackenzie (Time) | 16-29 Age Group (Time) | Faster Time | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:19 | 3:05 |
16-29 Age Group
7.0% faster
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:41 | 4:29 |
16-29 Age Group
4.3% faster
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:30 | 4:11 |
16-29 Age Group
7.0% faster
|
|
| Total Running | running | 29:09 | 30:21 |
Mackenzie
4.1% faster
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:52 | 1:39 |
16-29 Age Group
11.6% faster
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:37 | 3:09 |
16-29 Age Group
12.9% faster
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:47 | 4:07 |
Mackenzie
8.8% faster
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:55 | 2:05 |
Mackenzie
8.7% faster
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:28 | 3:44 |
16-29 Age Group
16.4% faster
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Absolute Time Mode: Direct comparison of raw times between athletes
- • Advantage: Percentage time difference (who was faster in absolute terms)
- • Use Case: See who actually completed each segment faster, regardless of expected performance
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Mackenzie, Orange = 16-29 Age Group