Age Group Comparison

Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women Su

Mackenzie Peters

Place: 126
Time: 1:06:31
Country:
Percentile: 40.1th
View detailed analysis →

16-29 Age Group Average

Place: N/A
Time: 1:06:16
Country: (91 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th

Category Comparison

Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)

aerobic Mackenzie: +5.8% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Mackenzie
5.8%
16-29 Age Group
strength Mackenzie: +7.2% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Mackenzie
7.2%
16-29 Age Group
running Mackenzie: -3.5% | 16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Mackenzie
3.5%
16-29 Age Group

Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance

Exercise Category Mackenzie (vs Expected) 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) Better Performance Visual
Burpee Broad Jump aerobic 3:19 (+5.9%) 3:05 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +5.9% better
Row aerobic 4:41 (+4.1%) 4:29 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +4.1% better
SkiErg aerobic 4:30 (+7.4%) 4:11 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +7.4% better
Total Running running 29:09 (-3.5%) 30:21 (+0.0%)
Mackenzie +3.5% better
Farmers Carry strength 1:52 (+12.8%) 1:39 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +12.8% better
Sandbag Lunges strength 3:37 (+13.0%) 3:09 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +13.0% better
Sled Pull strength 3:47 (-5.9%) 4:07 (+0.0%)
Mackenzie +5.9% better
Sled Push strength 1:55 (-4.1%) 2:05 (+0.0%)
Mackenzie +4.1% better
Wall Balls strength 4:28 (+20.4%) 3:44 (+0.0%)
16-29 Age Group +20.4% better

How to Read This Comparison