Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women Su
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:06:16
Country: (91 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Grace: +9.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Grace
9.0%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Grace: -1.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Grace
1.7%
16-29 Age Group
running
Grace: +3.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Grace
3.6%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Grace (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:54 (+14.7%) | 3:05 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+14.7% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:26 (+5.0%) | 4:29 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+5.0% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:15 (+7.1%) | 4:11 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.1% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 28:09 (+3.6%) | 30:21 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.6% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:33 (+7.0%) | 1:39 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.0% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:25 (-9.3%) | 3:09 (+0.0%) |
Grace
+9.3% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:16 (-1.4%) | 4:07 (+0.0%) |
Grace
+1.4% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:36 (-2.7%) | 2:05 (+0.0%) |
Grace
+2.7% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:07 (-2.1%) | 3:44 (+0.0%) |
Grace
+2.1% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Grace, Orange = 16-29 Age Group