Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women Su
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:06:16
Country: (91 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Lovise: -1.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lovise
1.7%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Lovise: +5.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lovise
5.1%
16-29 Age Group
running
Lovise: +2.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lovise
2.2%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Lovise (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:43 (-6.4%) | 3:05 (+0.0%) |
Lovise
+6.4% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:24 (+0.2%) | 4:29 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.2% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:09 (+1.1%) | 4:11 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.1% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 29:42 (+2.2%) | 30:21 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.2% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:33 (-1.7%) | 1:39 (+0.0%) |
Lovise
+1.7% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:07 (+4.0%) | 3:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.0% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:37 (-3.6%) | 4:07 (+0.0%) |
Lovise
+3.6% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:29 (+33.2%) | 2:05 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+33.2% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:17 (-6.4%) | 3:44 (+0.0%) |
Lovise
+6.4% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Lovise, Orange = 16-29 Age Group