Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Women Fr Sa
Comparison Scope:
35-39 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:14:46
Country: (118 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emma: +0.7% |
35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
0.7%
35-39 Age Group
strength
Emma: +3.9% |
35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
3.9%
35-39 Age Group
running
Emma: -3.1% |
35-39 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
3.1%
35-39 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emma (vs Expected) | 35-39 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:43 (-1.1%) | 4:24 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+1.1% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:08 (+4.4%) | 4:45 (+0.0%) |
35-39 Age Group
+4.4% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:41 (-1.4%) | 4:35 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+1.4% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 30:25 (-3.1%) | 30:14 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+3.1% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:39 (+15.8%) | 2:06 (+0.0%) |
35-39 Age Group
+15.8% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 5:07 (+12.5%) | 4:16 (+0.0%) |
35-39 Age Group
+12.5% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 6:24 (+9.7%) | 5:16 (+0.0%) |
35-39 Age Group
+9.7% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 3:36 (-16.9%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+16.9% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 5:45 (-1.6%) | 5:12 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+1.6% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emma, Orange = 35-39 Age Group