Age Group Comparison
Chicago 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Women Fr Sa
Comparison Scope:
Marla Schlaeger
Place: 590
Time: 1:24:21
Country: Canada
Percentile: 85.5th
16-24 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:17:37
Country: (101 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show absolute time advantage - who was faster in raw time (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Marla: 4:52 |
16-24 Age Group: 4:42
Marla
3.2%
16-24 Age Group
strength
Marla: 4:45 |
16-24 Age Group: 4:27
Marla
6.3%
16-24 Age Group
running
Marla: 34:03 |
16-24 Age Group: 30:57
Marla
9.1%
16-24 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Absolute Times
| Exercise | Category | Marla (Time) | 16-24 Age Group (Time) | Faster Time | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:32 | 4:34 |
Marla
0.7% faster
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:12 | 4:52 |
16-24 Age Group
6.4% faster
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:52 | 4:42 |
16-24 Age Group
3.4% faster
|
|
| Total Running | running | 34:03 | 30:57 |
16-24 Age Group
9.1% faster
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 3:00 | 2:21 |
16-24 Age Group
21.7% faster
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:41 | 4:23 |
Marla
19.0% faster
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 9:15 | 5:41 |
16-24 Age Group
38.6% faster
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:58 | 4:09 |
Marla
39.9% faster
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:54 | 5:44 |
Marla
17.0% faster
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Absolute Time Mode: Direct comparison of raw times between athletes
- • Advantage: Percentage time difference (who was faster in absolute terms)
- • Use Case: See who actually completed each segment faster, regardless of expected performance
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Marla, Orange = 16-24 Age Group