Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:15:30
Country: (320 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Nick: -2.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nick
2.9%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Nick: +11.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nick
11.8%
16-29 Age Group
running
Nick: +3.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Nick
3.1%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Nick (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:20 (-7.3%) | 2:45 (+0.0%) |
Nick
+7.3% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:13 (-1.2%) | 4:27 (+0.0%) |
Nick
+1.2% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:52 (-0.3%) | 3:59 (+0.0%) |
Nick
+0.3% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 34:50 (+3.1%) | 37:16 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.1% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:58 (+22.5%) | 1:44 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+22.5% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:51 (-6.7%) | 3:17 (+0.0%) |
Nick
+6.7% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 2:58 (+25.8%) | 2:36 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+25.8% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:42 (+7.7%) | 1:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.7% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:26 (+9.6%) | 4:31 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+9.6% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Nick, Orange = 16-29 Age Group