Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:22:58
Country: (513 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Celia: +7.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Celia
7.6%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Celia: +9.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Celia
9.1%
16-29 Age Group
running
Celia: +136.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Celia
136.6%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Celia (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:44 (-1.3%) | 3:16 (+0.0%) |
Celia
+1.3% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:03 (+11.7%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+11.7% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:35 (+12.3%) | 4:16 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+12.3% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 74:38 (+136.6%) | 39:12 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+136.6% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 2:10 (+26.6%) | 1:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+26.6% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:18 (-2.5%) | 3:53 (+0.0%) |
Celia
+2.5% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:00 (+8.3%) | 2:17 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+8.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:12 (+3.9%) | 4:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.9% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Celia, Orange = 16-29 Age Group