Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:22:58
Country: (513 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Grace: +4.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Grace
4.9%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Grace: -3.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Grace
3.4%
16-29 Age Group
running
Grace: -84.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Grace
84.3%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Grace (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:06 (+10.7%) | 3:16 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+10.7% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:51 (+6.9%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+6.9% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:58 (-3.1%) | 4:16 (+0.0%) |
Grace
+3.1% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 5:01 (-84.3%) | 39:12 (+0.0%) |
Grace
+84.3% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:43 (-0.4%) | 1:55 (+0.0%) |
Grace
+0.4% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:01 (-11.8%) | 3:53 (+0.0%) |
Grace
+11.8% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:13 (+12.5%) | 3:23 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+12.5% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:31 (-13.7%) | 4:55 (+0.0%) |
Grace
+13.7% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Grace, Orange = 16-29 Age Group