Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:26:16
Country: (1345 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emma: +1.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
1.2%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emma: +24.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
24.6%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emma: -0.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emma
0.8%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emma (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:49 (-18.7%) | 4:06 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+18.7% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:17 (+6.3%) | 5:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+6.3% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 5:17 (+16.1%) | 4:45 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+16.1% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 39:20 (-0.8%) | 42:41 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+0.8% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:43 (-5.2%) | 1:52 (+0.0%) |
Emma
+5.2% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:26 (+2.3%) | 3:34 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.3% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:08 (+3.7%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.7% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:24 (+35.2%) | 1:48 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+35.2% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 7:41 (+87.0%) | 4:25 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+87.0% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emma, Orange = 16-29 Age Group