Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:26:38
Country: (446 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Emily: +8.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
8.4%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Emily: +3.3% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
3.3%
16-29 Age Group
running
Emily: -2.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Emily
2.5%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Emily (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:41 (+20.4%) | 3:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+20.4% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 5:00 (-2.8%) | 5:06 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+2.8% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 5:03 (+7.5%) | 4:40 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.5% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 41:37 (-2.5%) | 42:27 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+2.5% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:48 (-7.4%) | 1:54 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+7.4% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:57 (+32.9%) | 3:33 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+32.9% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:07 (-5.4%) | 3:15 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+5.4% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:41 (-13.5%) | 1:57 (+0.0%) |
Emily
+13.5% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:53 (+10.2%) | 4:30 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+10.2% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Emily, Orange = 16-29 Age Group