Age Group Comparison
New York 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Pro Doubles Women
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:24:26
Country: (52 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Lisa: +0.1% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lisa
0.1%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Lisa: +9.5% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lisa
9.5%
16-29 Age Group
running
Lisa: -22.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Lisa
22.7%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Lisa (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:27 (+2.0%) | 3:40 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.0% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:39 (-4.7%) | 4:57 (+0.0%) |
Lisa
+4.7% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:37 (+3.0%) | 4:32 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+3.0% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 21:22 (-22.7%) | 28:43 (+0.0%) |
Lisa
+22.7% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:56 (-0.9%) | 2:01 (+0.0%) |
Lisa
+0.9% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:00 (-0.5%) | 4:14 (+0.0%) |
Lisa
+0.5% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:32 (+1.0%) | 3:37 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.0% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 3:01 (+35.3%) | 2:20 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+35.3% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 5:13 (+12.6%) | 5:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+12.6% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Lisa, Orange = 16-29 Age Group