Age Group Comparison
Rimini 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:14:18
Country: (320 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show absolute time advantage - who was faster in raw time (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Guillaume: 3:51 |
16-29 Age Group: 3:53
Guillaume
0.9%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Guillaume: 3:12 |
16-29 Age Group: 2:58
Guillaume
7.2%
16-29 Age Group
running
Guillaume: 35:07 |
16-29 Age Group: 36:20
Guillaume
3.5%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Absolute Times
| Exercise | Category | Guillaume (Time) | 16-29 Age Group (Time) | Faster Time | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:18 | 3:08 |
16-29 Age Group
5.1% faster
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:17 | 4:31 |
Guillaume
5.4% faster
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 3:58 | 4:00 |
Guillaume
0.8% faster
|
|
| Total Running | running | 35:07 | 36:20 |
Guillaume
3.5% faster
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:50 | 1:42 |
16-29 Age Group
7.3% faster
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:31 | 3:25 |
16-29 Age Group
2.8% faster
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:05 | 3:27 |
16-29 Age Group
15.5% faster
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:44 | 1:42 |
16-29 Age Group
1.9% faster
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:50 | 4:35 |
16-29 Age Group
5.2% faster
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Absolute Time Mode: Direct comparison of raw times between athletes
- • Advantage: Percentage time difference (who was faster in absolute terms)
- • Use Case: See who actually completed each segment faster, regardless of expected performance
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Guillaume, Orange = 16-29 Age Group