Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Men
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:10:02
Country: (260 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Ford: +2.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Ford
2.4%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Ford: +7.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Ford
7.6%
16-29 Age Group
running
Ford: -2.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Ford
2.4%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Ford (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 4:10 (+5.0%) | 3:21 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+5.0% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:33 (-2.8%) | 4:26 (+0.0%) |
Ford
+2.8% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:26 (+4.9%) | 4:03 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.9% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 36:49 (-2.4%) | 33:59 (+0.0%) |
Ford
+2.4% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:47 (+1.9%) | 1:33 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+1.9% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 4:02 (+8.1%) | 3:11 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+8.1% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:16 (+24.7%) | 3:08 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+24.7% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:06 (+13.6%) | 1:38 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+13.6% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:09 (-10.4%) | 4:18 (+0.0%) |
Ford
+10.4% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Ford, Orange = 16-29 Age Group