Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:19:01
Country: (264 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Beth: -2.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Beth
2.0%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Beth: +8.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Beth
8.6%
16-29 Age Group
running
Beth: -9.4% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Beth
9.4%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Beth (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 2:56 (-4.0%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
Beth
+4.0% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:04 (-0.1%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
Beth
+0.1% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 29:23 (-9.4%) | 39:21 (+0.0%) |
Beth
+9.4% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 2:43 (-8.8%) | 3:38 (+0.0%) |
Beth
+8.8% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:27 (+7.8%) | 3:55 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+7.8% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 2:10 (+30.7%) | 1:58 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+30.7% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:52 (+4.8%) | 4:39 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.8% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Beth, Orange = 16-29 Age Group