Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:19:01
Country: (264 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Dan: +4.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Dan
4.0%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Dan: +11.6% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Dan
11.6%
16-29 Age Group
running
Dan: +6.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Dan
6.9%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Dan (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:39 (+13.6%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+13.6% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:24 (-1.2%) | 4:44 (+0.0%) |
Dan
+1.2% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:06 (-0.4%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
Dan
+0.4% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 35:44 (+6.9%) | 39:21 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+6.9% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:35 (+0.8%) | 1:46 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+0.8% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:24 (+9.0%) | 3:38 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+9.0% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:07 (-6.1%) | 3:55 (+0.0%) |
Dan
+6.1% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 5:28 (+42.6%) | 4:39 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+42.6% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Dan, Orange = 16-29 Age Group