Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Adam: +6.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Adam
6.0%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Adam: +9.8% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Adam
9.8%
16-29 Age Group
running
Adam: -16.7% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Adam
16.7%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Adam (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:22 (+6.0%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+6.0% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 27:53 (-16.7%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
Adam
+16.7% better
|
|
| Farmers Carry | strength | 1:33 (-1.4%) | 1:51 (+0.0%) |
Adam
+1.4% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:15 (+4.0%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+4.0% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 3:52 (+16.3%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+16.3% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:46 (+2.8%) | 2:09 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+2.8% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 4:53 (+27.2%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+27.2% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Adam, Orange = 16-29 Age Group