Age Group Comparison
Cardiff 2025 - S8 • Hyrox Doubles Mixed
Comparison Scope:
16-29 Age Group Average
Place: N/A
Time: 1:23:02
Country: (1295 athletes)
Percentile: 50.0th
Category Comparison
Bars show relative strength advantage based on performance vs expected baseline (longer = bigger advantage)
aerobic
Ellis: -4.9% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Ellis
4.9%
16-29 Age Group
strength
Ellis: -4.2% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Ellis
4.2%
16-29 Age Group
running
Ellis: +14.0% |
16-29 Age Group: +0.0%
Ellis
14.0%
16-29 Age Group
Exercise Breakdown - Relative Performance
| Exercise | Category | Ellis (vs Expected) | 16-29 Age Group (vs Expected) | Better Performance | Visual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burpee Broad Jump | aerobic | 3:28 (-5.7%) | 3:28 (+0.0%) |
Ellis
+5.7% better
|
|
| Row | aerobic | 4:24 (-5.4%) | 4:46 (+0.0%) |
Ellis
+5.4% better
|
|
| SkiErg | aerobic | 4:06 (-3.7%) | 4:19 (+0.0%) |
Ellis
+3.7% better
|
|
| Total Running | running | 41:28 (+14.0%) | 40:17 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+14.0% better
|
|
| Sandbag Lunges | strength | 3:04 (-13.1%) | 3:54 (+0.0%) |
Ellis
+13.1% better
|
|
| Sled Pull | strength | 4:17 (+16.8%) | 3:51 (+0.0%) |
16-29 Age Group
+16.8% better
|
|
| Sled Push | strength | 1:48 (-4.6%) | 2:09 (+0.0%) |
Ellis
+4.6% better
|
|
| Wall Balls | strength | 3:34 (-16.1%) | 4:47 (+0.0%) |
Ellis
+16.1% better
|
|
How to Read This Comparison
- • Relative Performance Mode: Compares how each athlete performed vs their expected baseline
- • Variance %: Positive = slower than expected, Negative = faster than expected
- • Advantage: Difference in variance percentages (who performed better relative to expectations)
- • Use Case: Identify relative strengths/weaknesses - who's better at a category relative to their overall fitness level
- • Diverging Bars: Bar extends toward the athlete with the advantage in that category/exercise
- • Colors: Blue = Ellis, Orange = 16-29 Age Group